| Injustice, Bent Legal System, Crooked Lawyers, Hate Crimes, Wrongful Convictions, Manitoba Justice is complicit |
| Manitoba - a bent legal system under this and previous Attorney Generals - the system is too infested ... |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
Mr. Jack Ewatski, Chief of Police
Winnipeg Police Service
POB 1680, Winnipeg MB R3C 2Z7
13 DEC 2005
Dear Sir:
COMPLAINT AGAINST DAVID LANGTRY, JOE WILDER, SAM WILDER AND
OTHERS RE: 1] CONSPIRACY INVOLVING POLICE AND PROSECUTORS, MB
JUSTICE SYSTEM AND THE PERSONS NAMED ABOVE LEADING TO
WRONGFUL CONVICTION; 2] HATE CRIMES, 3] OTHER CRIMINAL CODE
VIOLATIONS BY THE PERPS
I am writing about the matters stated above. This is my formal complaint. If it does not
meet your requirement for investigation kindly state what specific information is lacking
for you to commence an investigation, so that I may represent or update the information.
My heading, above, is not intended to be the full legal description of the violations of my
Rights and or of the Criminal code by the perpetrators since this should flow from as well,
from your effective and complete investigation.
I realise that I am dealing with powerful forces – your own organization which was aware
of the motives and problems of the Wilder and Wilder perps, the judge himself, the
prosecutor and the other players that assisted in my wrongful conviction and the crimes
of the perps that brought this about. The material facts and documents are still available,
since it involves a real estate transaction that was botched by the Wilder group and
because the Crown has all of the documentation.
1. WHO I AM:
I am a former resident of MB and have been a resident of Brampton Ontario since about
1997-1998. I have handicaps/disabilities. These and the medications impair my ability to
focus on writing or reading for more than a half an hour or so at a time and I have to reply
on others to correct or vet my writing and limit my mobility. I have a conviction for perjury,
for which I received a 2 year probation, the subject of this complaint, and a conviction for
fraud for which I was sentenced to 18 months.
2. CONSPIRACY AND CRIMES BY OTHERS LEADING TO MY CONVICTION:
a. This complaint to the police is about the circumstances surrounding the charges
that led to the conviction.
b. I am trying to persuade the same corrupt system that assisted the conviction to
review the conviction, separately and as well, trying to persuade Federal agencies to
review these matters and do not expect that you will be involved in this at this time.
c. My complaint will try to show that the police, the prosecution and several lawyers
committed crimes in the process.
d. Several other lawyers not connected with the original transaction became aware
of the matter and did not reveal their knowledge to the police or to the prosecutors or to
the Court.
e. These lawyers included Alexander ‘Sandy’ MacKenzie and Joe Aiello. I will
describe their roles below.
f. Essentially, my claim is that a lawyer David Langtry made an error or errors with a
real estate transaction for me and for the mortgage lenders. He, with the advice of his
partners, Sam and Joe wilder, and likely Brian Pauls, devised a plan of action that was
of a criminal nature, involving a hate crime and a conspiracy to set me up for an
allegation of perjury if ever their original error was uncovered and placed them in a
position of financial or other loss.
g. I believe that the crimes included fraud, breach of trust, conspiracy, fraud on the
Court, perjury and various assaults on my Constitutional rights, including but not limited to
hate crimes. As I have stated above, this is not intended to limit the scope of the
descriptions of the crimes against me and the Court by the perps.
h. David Langtry represented me before the real estate transaction around 1987. He
approved the form of the offer to purchase at my request and so advised me and the
realtor who acted for me as the buyer who had taken the offer to purchase to him at my
request.
i. I had been out of Canada almost continuously between about 1979 to about 1986,
returning generally once or twice per year in order to meet the 6 month period set at that
time for Manitoba Medical benefits, and was uncertain of the existing rules for real estate
purchases in MB, so I insisted on incurring the additional expense of legal review by the
law firm of the primary perpetrators named above.
3. PRIMARY PERPETRATORS:
DAVID LANGTRY
I believe that one of the primary perpetrators, David Langtry is a lawyer again practicing
in Manitoba. At or around the time of his crimes, he had been a partner of the law firm
known as Wilder Wilder Langtry, is or was Executive Director of the Manitoba
Muticulturism Secretariat, or some such related entity responsible for recomending
the doling out of millions of tax payer dollars, was a former Conservative political
candidate in Winnipeg, is or was connected to the Folk Arts Council, is or was a
beneficiary of Wilex Management Ltd., which is or was the management instrument of
Wilder Wilder Langtry a law firm or of Langtry personally.
I believe that Landtry resides in the City of Winnipeg, in Manitoba.
I believe that David Langtry at one time during the approximate period of my trial was
pursued by several clients for fraud and other matters and that indeed several law suits
had been filed against Langtry and or his firm and or management company for fraud.
The Law Society of Manitoba, as is its unfortunate predisposition, permitted Langtry to
give up his membership, and, presto, was no longer a subject of investigation by the
Society and his file for fraud was not referred to the police or RCMP as far as I am
aware. Langtry was then permitted to again practice law as a member of the
accommodating Law Society of Manitoba.
JOSEPH WILDER
Another member of this cabal is Joseph J. Wilder who is a lawyer and partner of the law
firm known as Wilder Wilder Langtry, is or was intimately connected to Canadian Jewish
Congress and the B'nai B'rith and other such organizations, and resided in the City of
Winnipeg, in Manitoba, during their commitment of the crimes against me and the Court.
SAMUEL ISAAC WILDER
Another member of this cabal is Samuel Isaac Wilder who is a lawyer and was a partner
with the law firm known as Wilder Wilder Langtry, is or was intimately connected to
Canadian Jewish Congress and the B'nai B'rith and other such organizations, and
resided in the City of Winnipeg, in Manitoba, during their commitment of the crimes
against me and the Court.
BRIAN PAULS
Another member of this cabal is Brian Pauls is a lawyer and partner of the law firm
known as Wilder Wilder Langtry, and resided in the City of Winnipeg, in Manitoba, during
their commitment of the crimes against me and the Court.
At all material times the perpetrators individually and or jointly and severally and their
Wilder Wilder langtry law firm represented me.
The period of representation was from about 1979 to about 1990.
WINNIPEG POLICE
The investigator[s] and the person authorizing the investigation
PROSECUTOR AND JUSTICE DEPARTMENT
The prosecutor has full access to all the information and complied with the Wilder group
to prosecute me.
4] SECONDARY PERPETRATORS
ALEXANDER MacKENZIE
Alexander ‘Sandy’ MacKenzie represented me briefly prior to my trial for perjury and
uncovered the evidence that Langtry and his firm had made errors in the registration of
mortgages and handling of my real estate purchase. He told me that the errors included
breaches of the Code of Conduct of the Law Society of MB [LSMB].
JOE AIELLO
Joe Aiello represented me during my trial and the Appeal.
Sandy MacKenzie briefed him on the results of his research and the discovery of the
errors made by Langtry and his firm.
5] BACKGROUND TO THE CRIMES AGAINST ME:
Around 1987, I hired Langtry and his firm to examine any Offer to Purchase I would make
on a house in Winnipeg, Manitoba. Indeed, I later made an offer on a house on Home
street, In Winnipeg, MB, which offer had been prepared by the realtor for Michael James
Realty, and asked Langtry to approve the offer as to its legal correctness, language and
organization, as one of the conditions I had imposed on the sellers for my acceptance of
the Offer to Purchase was its approval by my lawyers, [as named above]. I had
reminded Langtry that he had last been involved with negotiations for the purchase of a
house in Canada, for my daughter, around 1982. I wanted to ensure that any offer written
by a realtor, was not inimical to my interests.
Langtry approved the Offer, telephoned me to confirm the details, undertook
to deal with the transaction, the realtor and with the mortgage lenders on my
behalf.
Around April of 1987, Wilder Wilder and Langtry arranged for the real estate closing and
for me and my spouse Cecilia Gallo Ishmael to move into and take possession of the
home.
I learned much later that Langtry and his firm represented both me and the mortgage
grantors, one of whom was Royal Trust or some such legal entity known
popularly as Royal Trust as well as the vendor who took back a 2nd mortgage
Langtry instructed me to move into the home on Home Street, after much delay on
his part. About 10 days after, Langtry summoned me to the offices of Wilder Wilder
Langtry and Wilex Management Ltd. Thereupon, he
informed me that he could not conclude the mortgage transaction because
he was just informed by his clerk of a series of about 8 liens registered
against me and related to judgements dated around 1985.
Langtry showed me a printout of numbers that had no explanations and said
that these represented 1985 judgements. I told Langtry that it was unlikely
that such 1985 judgements were mine since I had been away from Canada
almost continuously from about 1979 to about 1986, as Langtry and his
firm knew firsthand since his firm had handled my affairs during those years.
On the other hand, I reminded David Langtry of the distinctiveness of my
name, and suggested that he and his firm check the judgements out to
insure that default judgements were not obtained against me in 1985.
Langtry would have none of that and insisted that he would prepare a brief
statement to the effect that the judgements were not mine and such
statement would enable his firm to register the mortgage or mortgages so
that I would not have to vacate the home with my wife. This was a prospect
that Langtry emphasized, creating great distress for me. I asked Langtry
how long it would take to track down the source and background of the
judgements, since my name was an unusual one. Otherwise, why not pay
the judgement [about $600, I believe] and get a refund if it were an error by
the government.
Langtry told me was uncertain of how much time would be involved to
investigate that matter and insisted that it would be a simple matter for him
to prepare the previously mentioned statement since I had no
immediate or firsthand knowledge of these 1985 judgements, as they were
described by Langtry. I insisted Langtry pay them from my funds in his
possession and challenge them later.
Langtry insisted that it would be simpler to have me sign the statement. This
statement was prepared by the Langtry and I signed it. I cannot recall if
it was signed in blank, since this was a common practice for Langtry in
relation to work done for me [and other of his clients].
At no time did Langtry’ offer me an alternative nor explain the consequences, if indeed
the 1985 judgements, however improbable, were mine. At no time did Langtry even
suggest that these judgements could be 1979 or earlier judgements, in any manner.
Langtry warned my wife and I would likely have to move out of the home if
this matter were not settled immediately and causing the first mortgage
lender to withdraw. At all times Langtry was anxious to have me sign the
statement so that he could comply with the requirements of his other
clients, the mortgage grantors. At no time at all, did Langtry advise me of
the adverse consequences of following his legal advice or of other
alternatives available to me.
As it turned out, I learned much later that there were only 2 liens, not 8, as
Langtry had stated.
I allege that Langtry and his partners and firm were engaged in a fraud in
in this matter, and that Langtry must have known that the judgements
were valid when they investigated as indeed his firm would have had to and
been obliged to do.
As I learned from Mr. MacKenzie, after the charge was laid against me,
Langtry and his firm had apparently paid out the mortgage monies to the
vendors and then discovered that the judgement [it turned out to be from the
Labour Department] against me was also, in those years, automatically
Registered against any real property I owned – the house, for example.
I believe that about that time or thereafter, Langtry [or he and his firm] was
being reviewed, audited or investigated by the Law Society for irregularities.
I also was advised after the charges were laid that if Langtry had discharged
the small lien from my funds in his possession or additionally received from
me, he would have had registration complications that would have revealed
his shoddy work to the mortgage lender[s] and to the law society.
Langtry, his firm and the Wilders and Brian Pauls planned that Langtry
would hustle me to sign a statement and if the matter became a problem
for them then they would be able to claim I induced a fraud and thus free
them of direct liability and their insurance could cover them for this matter, if
need be.
Additionally, since the Wilders and Langtry were racially or religiously or
politically antagonistic to me they could use the statement that they had
wormed out of me to harm me. All of these parties had already excoriated
me for a manuscript which I had given that firm to copyright and which was
favourable to Blacks, Arabs and Palestinians and unfavourable to Israel for
its support of Apartheid and its ghastly treatment of Palestinians.
About a year or more after this purchase, the Winnipeg Police approached
me and said that the statement prepared by Langtry and signed by me was
false since the judgements related to judgements around 1979 or 1980 and
had simply been renewed every 2 or three years by the Province of
Manitoba under a system no longer used by the Province of Manitoba. I
telephoned Langtry after the arrival of the police and sought advice about
the giving of a statement. David Langtry told me that he saw no reason to
worry about my giving such a statement without his or a lawyer’s presence.
Langtry advised me that he had also been interviewed by the police but he
had seen no reason to advise me that the police would be visiting me.
The police must have discovered the true sequence of events and the nature of
the mortgage defects during their investigations but did not reveal these to me
or my lawyers.
I was charged, found guilty of perjury and was placed on probation for two
years. Langtry gave evidence at the trial that he had neglected to make the
proper searches for these judgements or liens and therefore could not
register the mortgage[s].
Judge Scollin [?] found that although I had not sworn or affirmed the
statement I was guilty of perjury, albeit one on a very low scale and placed
me on two years probation.
During the preparation for trial, Sandy MacKenzie suggested that Langtry
may have faced legal problems with Royal Trust [one of the two mortgage
lenders], since I had defaulted on the mortgage during the course of my
divorce and this would have revealed the mortgage problem. Royal Trust or its
insurance agency or some similar entity, had suffered a loss or potential loss as
a result of their mortgage not being superior to that of the liens.
Alternatively, Langtry and his firm had faced some review of his files by the Law
Society and that created a problem for him which was satisfied by his having
my statement which he had insisted do much on having rather than paying the
lien if it were mine.
My lawyer Joe Aiello did not permit me to take the stand and testify [See my NOTE
about Joe to the left of this box] during
the trial, strongly and vehemently advising me, even in the court room at the
time the Judge asked if I wanted to give testimony, that my desire to explain
Langtry’s role would merely:-
'implicate Langtry, who was clearly guilty of misconduct or worse, to no benefit and
probably to my disadvantage of the eyes of the court.'
I allege that Langtry and the primary group of perpetrators:
-a- were negligent in the handling of my real estate transaction from the time of their
approval of the offer to purchase, botching the registration of the mortgage, permitting
me to assume possession of the house prior to the prudent and necessary legal
procedures being completed; that they also approved and furthered a transaction which
was against the regulations of CMHC and the requirements of the first mortgage grantor
[according to Mr. MacKenzie].
-b- wickedly initiated a scheme whereby they advised and encouraged me to sign an
affidavit while withholding from me the reasons for their desperate desire to have me
sign rather than pay the small lien.
-c- wrongly advised me that the judgements were incurred in the year 1985
-d- conspired to encourage the laying of a perjury charge against me to assist them in
their settlement with the mortgage grantor[s] or the law society or their insurance
companies and in furtherance of their desire to harm me
-e- did not reveal their negligence or complicity to my legal counsel or to the court.
-f- obtained the active collaboration of the Winnipeg Police, the Justice Department and
Prosecutors and others to further this crime against me.
I also allege that Langtry and his firm were involved in approving an incorrect Offer to
Purchase. During the examination of the files by my lawyers, Alexander Mackenzie and
subsequently, Joe Aiello, around 1991 and 1992, both lawyers said that they had found
that the Offer to Purchase was in violation of the terms of the CMHC [Central Mortgage
and Housing Corporation], since I had only used $500.00 of my money as a down
payment as was shown on the Offer to Purchase.
Up to the time of such examination of the files, I was completely unaware of the defect
mentioned in paragraph above. Langtry and this group of perpetrators had not raised
that issue with me until after the trial when I told Langtry that I planned to take this matter
to the authorities. He sent word that if I did, he would see that I was also prosecuted for
this.
The fact that this issue was not raised by the Crown leads to the probability that the
perjury charge was laid for the purpose of protecting the economic and legal interests of
Langtry and his firm by their collusion with venal elements of the Manitoba justice system.
BACKGROUND FOR HATE CRIMES AGAINST ME.
[This information is provided to assist you in understanding some of the motives of the
perps]
. I also claim that I was a target of a conspiracy among and between Langtry
and the others I have named, arising out of the racial or religious hatred which some or
all of the Langtry perps directed to me.
These events precede the laying of the perjury charges.
This hatred was confirmed by Langtry in early 1988, to me. Langtry explained that my
letter published by the Winnipeg Free Press expressing abhorrence at the brutality
directed by Israel toward Palestinians under its occupation, had greatly offended his
partners Samuel and Joseph Wilder and 'made his job of representing me more difficult.'
Langtry also told me that the manuscript for my book "THE BLACK BUG - The genetic
bomb has arrived," which I had given to Langtry to copyright in his family's name, had
also offended the Wilders and Pauls and caused Langtry considerable difficulty with his
partners and firm in representing me.
Langtry demanded that I see the Wilders and one other law partner, Brian Pauls, and
assure them that I, 'was not anti-semitic.' Langtry arranged such meetings and continued
to represent me. I had asked Langtry to put his firm's concerns in writing but he refused
to do so. Instead, I wrote Langtry and the Wilders confirming their demand and sent that
letter by special Canada Post electronic mail.
I also claim that Langtry and his firm participated in ruining a travel and communications
business of which I was a founder and director. The business was Canadian Premier
Air Inc. [d/b/a Travel Smart-Convention Centre]. It was located at the Winnipeg
Convention Centre with whom I had signed a lease with the assistance of Langtry about
November, 1987. Around October, 1987, I had requested the leasing of premises
occupied by a bankrupt travel business, Executive Travel, located next to Folk Arts
Council, from the Winnipeg convention Centre Corporation. I had approached the
Langtry firm to assist with this lease. During the latter part of the negotiations, the
lessor, Winnipeg Convention Centre Corporation, told me that the desired location was
not available any longer. I settled for an inferior location at the Convention Centre.
The original location, it turned out, was subsequently rented by the Folk Arts Council,
whose President, it was later learned, was the same David Langtry, my lawyer.
In December 1987, when my business was open, the Convention Centre Corporation
had neglected and refused to remove a sign for the defunct Executive Travel, which had
rented offices at the Convention Centre. The Convention Centre Corporation told me
that this defunct travel office was now under the control of the Folk Arts Council. Despite
repeated requests to the Folk Arts Council, to David Morrison of the Folk Arts Council,
and to the Convention Centre Corporation by me and my corporation, verbally and in
writing, the sign was not removed or the light in the sign turned off. As a direct result,
many customers and potential customers who visited the Convention Centre looking for
me and my business would see the open curtain, the travel sign and the overturned
chairs in this bankrupt and deserted space next to the Folk Arts Council and would leave,
convinced my business was bankrupt.
I had sent copies of my entreaties to the Convention Centre Corporation and the Folk
Arts Council, and to the Langtry over a period of about 3 or 4 months. Langtry told me
that he was unable to assist me or my corporation. When the I threatened, in
desperation, to tear down the sign, the Convention Centre Corporation simply asked one
of its maintenance personnel to remove the plastic fascia, a job which took about ten
minutes. By that time, I learned that the word around town was that my business had
gone bankrupt and the office had been abandoned but I was still trying to collect money
for travel sales.
A short time later I obtained information that Langtry was President of Folk Arts
Council, the same organization to which I had been directing
written and personal appeals for the removal of the sign, or the closing
of the curtains abandoned office, or the turning off of the light to the sign
I confronted Langtry with this information, this Langtry said that he
was 'unaware' that the letters had been sent to the Folk Arts Council
or that entreaties had been made to them. Langtry did not deny
receiving copies of my letters to the landlord or his phone calls
asking for help, but told me that he assumed that this was a problem
for the landlord.
Instead of dealing with the issue of his apparent conflict, Langtry
again reminded me to be 'careful of the message' of the manuscript
of my book. At no time had Langtry revealed his relationship
to Folk Arts Council to me nor had he told me in November of 1987,
that the Folk Arts Council would rent the office space which I
desired and which contract terms he was assisting me to negotiate
and conclude
[I learned subsequently, that Langtry's relative, Chris Lorenc, was also
a member of the board of directors of the Convention Centre
Corporation, while I was struggling to obtain assistance from that
corporation in relation to the signs.]
At about the same time, I asked Langtry to represent my interests in relation to a
campaign by the owners of the Pegasus reservation system, with a senior Manitoba
manager of Air Canada and by ACTA, the Alliance of Canadian Travel Associations, to
prevent him from operating his business, which was a merger of the communications
and travel industries. Eventually, Langtry refused to represent me, stating that they
represented ACTA and Air Canada. However, they first obtained all of my files and
positions before relaying this information regarding their representing ACTA and Air
Canada.
Finally, when I could not persuade Langtry to return my numerous phone calls,
sometimes several per day, I resorted to subterfuge, left the name Israel Wiseman, a
private phone number and, within minutes of my being told once more that Langtry was
not in office, Langtry telephoned this special phone number and asked for the fictional
Israel Wiseman. When his call, taken by Wade Williams, a visible minority community
leader, he was transferred to me.
Langtry, embarrassed, apologised to me for ignoring my business files and calls, and
told me that he would meet out of his office and explain, 'unofficially', what was
happening.
At that meeting which took place at the Winnipeg Convention Centre cafeteria, Langtry
repeated his partners' concerns about my political opinions, my book, THE BLACK BUG
, and my friendship with Wade Tudor Williams, a Black community activist, whom Langtry
described as 'a racist.' Langtry also told me that it was not only my files which had been
neglected but that the Law Society had strongly recommended to him that he pay more
timely attention to his other clients. He agreed to devote some attention to some of my
pending matters, which he did, slowly.
Around 1990, Israel Asper's CKND tv station devoted three consecutive news casts to
my company's operation of a remote self training system, by which persons would be
linked to a mammoth American Airlines data base in the USA, in direct competition with
the Premier of Manitoba's Success College. Some of the material used to prepare the
newscast was material from my legal files with the perps. [I subsequently prevailed in a
case brought by the Manitoba justice system regarding Private Schools and which was
heavily influenced by the senior prosecutor mentioned below.]
When THE BLACK BUG - The Genetic Bomb Has Arrived - was published in November
1990, organizations to which the Wilder Wilder Langtry group belonged pressured
booksellers to remove the books from their shelves or to not order. These organizations
actively promoted me as being anti-Semitic, based on this book.
This even took the form of a conversation with plaintif's former lawyer, Alexander
Mackenzie, and a senior prosecutor of the Manitoba justice system, who approached
MacKenzie prior to my trial, to state that, because I was 'a known anti-semite', he could
arrange a non-Jewish judge.
This conversation had a frightening and poisonous effect on the Mackenzie's relationship
with me, as was intended. MacKenzie shortly after told me that he ‘had to earn a living in
this town’ and suggested another lawyer act for me.
The matters in some of the above are intended to show that the Langtry and his cohorts
actions were part of a deliberate plan to harm me personally, to harm my business
endeavours, and to deprive me of his civil and constitutional rights, and are part of a
pattern of behaviour including criminal and civil wrongs.
Their actions have resulted in tragic consequences for me and my family emotionally and
financially including my being prosecuted and convicted for perjury.
I ask that you investigate these matters and cooperate with me so that I can provide
more information if needed. If any of these matters also should be investigated by the
RCMP, kindly also advise me promptly.
Sincerely,
J. Ishmael
Winnipeg Police Service
POB 1680, Winnipeg MB R3C 2Z7
13 DEC 2005
Dear Sir:
COMPLAINT AGAINST DAVID LANGTRY, JOE WILDER, SAM WILDER AND
OTHERS RE: 1] CONSPIRACY INVOLVING POLICE AND PROSECUTORS, MB
JUSTICE SYSTEM AND THE PERSONS NAMED ABOVE LEADING TO
WRONGFUL CONVICTION; 2] HATE CRIMES, 3] OTHER CRIMINAL CODE
VIOLATIONS BY THE PERPS
I am writing about the matters stated above. This is my formal complaint. If it does not
meet your requirement for investigation kindly state what specific information is lacking
for you to commence an investigation, so that I may represent or update the information.
My heading, above, is not intended to be the full legal description of the violations of my
Rights and or of the Criminal code by the perpetrators since this should flow from as well,
from your effective and complete investigation.
I realise that I am dealing with powerful forces – your own organization which was aware
of the motives and problems of the Wilder and Wilder perps, the judge himself, the
prosecutor and the other players that assisted in my wrongful conviction and the crimes
of the perps that brought this about. The material facts and documents are still available,
since it involves a real estate transaction that was botched by the Wilder group and
because the Crown has all of the documentation.
1. WHO I AM:
I am a former resident of MB and have been a resident of Brampton Ontario since about
1997-1998. I have handicaps/disabilities. These and the medications impair my ability to
focus on writing or reading for more than a half an hour or so at a time and I have to reply
on others to correct or vet my writing and limit my mobility. I have a conviction for perjury,
for which I received a 2 year probation, the subject of this complaint, and a conviction for
fraud for which I was sentenced to 18 months.
2. CONSPIRACY AND CRIMES BY OTHERS LEADING TO MY CONVICTION:
a. This complaint to the police is about the circumstances surrounding the charges
that led to the conviction.
b. I am trying to persuade the same corrupt system that assisted the conviction to
review the conviction, separately and as well, trying to persuade Federal agencies to
review these matters and do not expect that you will be involved in this at this time.
c. My complaint will try to show that the police, the prosecution and several lawyers
committed crimes in the process.
d. Several other lawyers not connected with the original transaction became aware
of the matter and did not reveal their knowledge to the police or to the prosecutors or to
the Court.
e. These lawyers included Alexander ‘Sandy’ MacKenzie and Joe Aiello. I will
describe their roles below.
f. Essentially, my claim is that a lawyer David Langtry made an error or errors with a
real estate transaction for me and for the mortgage lenders. He, with the advice of his
partners, Sam and Joe wilder, and likely Brian Pauls, devised a plan of action that was
of a criminal nature, involving a hate crime and a conspiracy to set me up for an
allegation of perjury if ever their original error was uncovered and placed them in a
position of financial or other loss.
g. I believe that the crimes included fraud, breach of trust, conspiracy, fraud on the
Court, perjury and various assaults on my Constitutional rights, including but not limited to
hate crimes. As I have stated above, this is not intended to limit the scope of the
descriptions of the crimes against me and the Court by the perps.
h. David Langtry represented me before the real estate transaction around 1987. He
approved the form of the offer to purchase at my request and so advised me and the
realtor who acted for me as the buyer who had taken the offer to purchase to him at my
request.
i. I had been out of Canada almost continuously between about 1979 to about 1986,
returning generally once or twice per year in order to meet the 6 month period set at that
time for Manitoba Medical benefits, and was uncertain of the existing rules for real estate
purchases in MB, so I insisted on incurring the additional expense of legal review by the
law firm of the primary perpetrators named above.
3. PRIMARY PERPETRATORS:
DAVID LANGTRY
I believe that one of the primary perpetrators, David Langtry is a lawyer again practicing
in Manitoba. At or around the time of his crimes, he had been a partner of the law firm
known as Wilder Wilder Langtry, is or was Executive Director of the Manitoba
Muticulturism Secretariat, or some such related entity responsible for recomending
the doling out of millions of tax payer dollars, was a former Conservative political
candidate in Winnipeg, is or was connected to the Folk Arts Council, is or was a
beneficiary of Wilex Management Ltd., which is or was the management instrument of
Wilder Wilder Langtry a law firm or of Langtry personally.
I believe that Landtry resides in the City of Winnipeg, in Manitoba.
I believe that David Langtry at one time during the approximate period of my trial was
pursued by several clients for fraud and other matters and that indeed several law suits
had been filed against Langtry and or his firm and or management company for fraud.
The Law Society of Manitoba, as is its unfortunate predisposition, permitted Langtry to
give up his membership, and, presto, was no longer a subject of investigation by the
Society and his file for fraud was not referred to the police or RCMP as far as I am
aware. Langtry was then permitted to again practice law as a member of the
accommodating Law Society of Manitoba.
JOSEPH WILDER
Another member of this cabal is Joseph J. Wilder who is a lawyer and partner of the law
firm known as Wilder Wilder Langtry, is or was intimately connected to Canadian Jewish
Congress and the B'nai B'rith and other such organizations, and resided in the City of
Winnipeg, in Manitoba, during their commitment of the crimes against me and the Court.
SAMUEL ISAAC WILDER
Another member of this cabal is Samuel Isaac Wilder who is a lawyer and was a partner
with the law firm known as Wilder Wilder Langtry, is or was intimately connected to
Canadian Jewish Congress and the B'nai B'rith and other such organizations, and
resided in the City of Winnipeg, in Manitoba, during their commitment of the crimes
against me and the Court.
BRIAN PAULS
Another member of this cabal is Brian Pauls is a lawyer and partner of the law firm
known as Wilder Wilder Langtry, and resided in the City of Winnipeg, in Manitoba, during
their commitment of the crimes against me and the Court.
At all material times the perpetrators individually and or jointly and severally and their
Wilder Wilder langtry law firm represented me.
The period of representation was from about 1979 to about 1990.
WINNIPEG POLICE
The investigator[s] and the person authorizing the investigation
PROSECUTOR AND JUSTICE DEPARTMENT
The prosecutor has full access to all the information and complied with the Wilder group
to prosecute me.
4] SECONDARY PERPETRATORS
ALEXANDER MacKENZIE
Alexander ‘Sandy’ MacKenzie represented me briefly prior to my trial for perjury and
uncovered the evidence that Langtry and his firm had made errors in the registration of
mortgages and handling of my real estate purchase. He told me that the errors included
breaches of the Code of Conduct of the Law Society of MB [LSMB].
JOE AIELLO
Joe Aiello represented me during my trial and the Appeal.
Sandy MacKenzie briefed him on the results of his research and the discovery of the
errors made by Langtry and his firm.
5] BACKGROUND TO THE CRIMES AGAINST ME:
Around 1987, I hired Langtry and his firm to examine any Offer to Purchase I would make
on a house in Winnipeg, Manitoba. Indeed, I later made an offer on a house on Home
street, In Winnipeg, MB, which offer had been prepared by the realtor for Michael James
Realty, and asked Langtry to approve the offer as to its legal correctness, language and
organization, as one of the conditions I had imposed on the sellers for my acceptance of
the Offer to Purchase was its approval by my lawyers, [as named above]. I had
reminded Langtry that he had last been involved with negotiations for the purchase of a
house in Canada, for my daughter, around 1982. I wanted to ensure that any offer written
by a realtor, was not inimical to my interests.
Langtry approved the Offer, telephoned me to confirm the details, undertook
to deal with the transaction, the realtor and with the mortgage lenders on my
behalf.
Around April of 1987, Wilder Wilder and Langtry arranged for the real estate closing and
for me and my spouse Cecilia Gallo Ishmael to move into and take possession of the
home.
I learned much later that Langtry and his firm represented both me and the mortgage
grantors, one of whom was Royal Trust or some such legal entity known
popularly as Royal Trust as well as the vendor who took back a 2nd mortgage
Langtry instructed me to move into the home on Home Street, after much delay on
his part. About 10 days after, Langtry summoned me to the offices of Wilder Wilder
Langtry and Wilex Management Ltd. Thereupon, he
informed me that he could not conclude the mortgage transaction because
he was just informed by his clerk of a series of about 8 liens registered
against me and related to judgements dated around 1985.
Langtry showed me a printout of numbers that had no explanations and said
that these represented 1985 judgements. I told Langtry that it was unlikely
that such 1985 judgements were mine since I had been away from Canada
almost continuously from about 1979 to about 1986, as Langtry and his
firm knew firsthand since his firm had handled my affairs during those years.
On the other hand, I reminded David Langtry of the distinctiveness of my
name, and suggested that he and his firm check the judgements out to
insure that default judgements were not obtained against me in 1985.
Langtry would have none of that and insisted that he would prepare a brief
statement to the effect that the judgements were not mine and such
statement would enable his firm to register the mortgage or mortgages so
that I would not have to vacate the home with my wife. This was a prospect
that Langtry emphasized, creating great distress for me. I asked Langtry
how long it would take to track down the source and background of the
judgements, since my name was an unusual one. Otherwise, why not pay
the judgement [about $600, I believe] and get a refund if it were an error by
the government.
Langtry told me was uncertain of how much time would be involved to
investigate that matter and insisted that it would be a simple matter for him
to prepare the previously mentioned statement since I had no
immediate or firsthand knowledge of these 1985 judgements, as they were
described by Langtry. I insisted Langtry pay them from my funds in his
possession and challenge them later.
Langtry insisted that it would be simpler to have me sign the statement. This
statement was prepared by the Langtry and I signed it. I cannot recall if
it was signed in blank, since this was a common practice for Langtry in
relation to work done for me [and other of his clients].
At no time did Langtry’ offer me an alternative nor explain the consequences, if indeed
the 1985 judgements, however improbable, were mine. At no time did Langtry even
suggest that these judgements could be 1979 or earlier judgements, in any manner.
Langtry warned my wife and I would likely have to move out of the home if
this matter were not settled immediately and causing the first mortgage
lender to withdraw. At all times Langtry was anxious to have me sign the
statement so that he could comply with the requirements of his other
clients, the mortgage grantors. At no time at all, did Langtry advise me of
the adverse consequences of following his legal advice or of other
alternatives available to me.
As it turned out, I learned much later that there were only 2 liens, not 8, as
Langtry had stated.
I allege that Langtry and his partners and firm were engaged in a fraud in
in this matter, and that Langtry must have known that the judgements
were valid when they investigated as indeed his firm would have had to and
been obliged to do.
As I learned from Mr. MacKenzie, after the charge was laid against me,
Langtry and his firm had apparently paid out the mortgage monies to the
vendors and then discovered that the judgement [it turned out to be from the
Labour Department] against me was also, in those years, automatically
Registered against any real property I owned – the house, for example.
I believe that about that time or thereafter, Langtry [or he and his firm] was
being reviewed, audited or investigated by the Law Society for irregularities.
I also was advised after the charges were laid that if Langtry had discharged
the small lien from my funds in his possession or additionally received from
me, he would have had registration complications that would have revealed
his shoddy work to the mortgage lender[s] and to the law society.
Langtry, his firm and the Wilders and Brian Pauls planned that Langtry
would hustle me to sign a statement and if the matter became a problem
for them then they would be able to claim I induced a fraud and thus free
them of direct liability and their insurance could cover them for this matter, if
need be.
Additionally, since the Wilders and Langtry were racially or religiously or
politically antagonistic to me they could use the statement that they had
wormed out of me to harm me. All of these parties had already excoriated
me for a manuscript which I had given that firm to copyright and which was
favourable to Blacks, Arabs and Palestinians and unfavourable to Israel for
its support of Apartheid and its ghastly treatment of Palestinians.
About a year or more after this purchase, the Winnipeg Police approached
me and said that the statement prepared by Langtry and signed by me was
false since the judgements related to judgements around 1979 or 1980 and
had simply been renewed every 2 or three years by the Province of
Manitoba under a system no longer used by the Province of Manitoba. I
telephoned Langtry after the arrival of the police and sought advice about
the giving of a statement. David Langtry told me that he saw no reason to
worry about my giving such a statement without his or a lawyer’s presence.
Langtry advised me that he had also been interviewed by the police but he
had seen no reason to advise me that the police would be visiting me.
The police must have discovered the true sequence of events and the nature of
the mortgage defects during their investigations but did not reveal these to me
or my lawyers.
I was charged, found guilty of perjury and was placed on probation for two
years. Langtry gave evidence at the trial that he had neglected to make the
proper searches for these judgements or liens and therefore could not
register the mortgage[s].
Judge Scollin [?] found that although I had not sworn or affirmed the
statement I was guilty of perjury, albeit one on a very low scale and placed
me on two years probation.
During the preparation for trial, Sandy MacKenzie suggested that Langtry
may have faced legal problems with Royal Trust [one of the two mortgage
lenders], since I had defaulted on the mortgage during the course of my
divorce and this would have revealed the mortgage problem. Royal Trust or its
insurance agency or some similar entity, had suffered a loss or potential loss as
a result of their mortgage not being superior to that of the liens.
Alternatively, Langtry and his firm had faced some review of his files by the Law
Society and that created a problem for him which was satisfied by his having
my statement which he had insisted do much on having rather than paying the
lien if it were mine.
My lawyer Joe Aiello did not permit me to take the stand and testify [See my NOTE
about Joe to the left of this box] during
the trial, strongly and vehemently advising me, even in the court room at the
time the Judge asked if I wanted to give testimony, that my desire to explain
Langtry’s role would merely:-
'implicate Langtry, who was clearly guilty of misconduct or worse, to no benefit and
probably to my disadvantage of the eyes of the court.'
I allege that Langtry and the primary group of perpetrators:
-a- were negligent in the handling of my real estate transaction from the time of their
approval of the offer to purchase, botching the registration of the mortgage, permitting
me to assume possession of the house prior to the prudent and necessary legal
procedures being completed; that they also approved and furthered a transaction which
was against the regulations of CMHC and the requirements of the first mortgage grantor
[according to Mr. MacKenzie].
-b- wickedly initiated a scheme whereby they advised and encouraged me to sign an
affidavit while withholding from me the reasons for their desperate desire to have me
sign rather than pay the small lien.
-c- wrongly advised me that the judgements were incurred in the year 1985
-d- conspired to encourage the laying of a perjury charge against me to assist them in
their settlement with the mortgage grantor[s] or the law society or their insurance
companies and in furtherance of their desire to harm me
-e- did not reveal their negligence or complicity to my legal counsel or to the court.
-f- obtained the active collaboration of the Winnipeg Police, the Justice Department and
Prosecutors and others to further this crime against me.
I also allege that Langtry and his firm were involved in approving an incorrect Offer to
Purchase. During the examination of the files by my lawyers, Alexander Mackenzie and
subsequently, Joe Aiello, around 1991 and 1992, both lawyers said that they had found
that the Offer to Purchase was in violation of the terms of the CMHC [Central Mortgage
and Housing Corporation], since I had only used $500.00 of my money as a down
payment as was shown on the Offer to Purchase.
Up to the time of such examination of the files, I was completely unaware of the defect
mentioned in paragraph above. Langtry and this group of perpetrators had not raised
that issue with me until after the trial when I told Langtry that I planned to take this matter
to the authorities. He sent word that if I did, he would see that I was also prosecuted for
this.
The fact that this issue was not raised by the Crown leads to the probability that the
perjury charge was laid for the purpose of protecting the economic and legal interests of
Langtry and his firm by their collusion with venal elements of the Manitoba justice system.
BACKGROUND FOR HATE CRIMES AGAINST ME.
[This information is provided to assist you in understanding some of the motives of the
perps]
. I also claim that I was a target of a conspiracy among and between Langtry
and the others I have named, arising out of the racial or religious hatred which some or
all of the Langtry perps directed to me.
These events precede the laying of the perjury charges.
This hatred was confirmed by Langtry in early 1988, to me. Langtry explained that my
letter published by the Winnipeg Free Press expressing abhorrence at the brutality
directed by Israel toward Palestinians under its occupation, had greatly offended his
partners Samuel and Joseph Wilder and 'made his job of representing me more difficult.'
Langtry also told me that the manuscript for my book "THE BLACK BUG - The genetic
bomb has arrived," which I had given to Langtry to copyright in his family's name, had
also offended the Wilders and Pauls and caused Langtry considerable difficulty with his
partners and firm in representing me.
Langtry demanded that I see the Wilders and one other law partner, Brian Pauls, and
assure them that I, 'was not anti-semitic.' Langtry arranged such meetings and continued
to represent me. I had asked Langtry to put his firm's concerns in writing but he refused
to do so. Instead, I wrote Langtry and the Wilders confirming their demand and sent that
letter by special Canada Post electronic mail.
I also claim that Langtry and his firm participated in ruining a travel and communications
business of which I was a founder and director. The business was Canadian Premier
Air Inc. [d/b/a Travel Smart-Convention Centre]. It was located at the Winnipeg
Convention Centre with whom I had signed a lease with the assistance of Langtry about
November, 1987. Around October, 1987, I had requested the leasing of premises
occupied by a bankrupt travel business, Executive Travel, located next to Folk Arts
Council, from the Winnipeg convention Centre Corporation. I had approached the
Langtry firm to assist with this lease. During the latter part of the negotiations, the
lessor, Winnipeg Convention Centre Corporation, told me that the desired location was
not available any longer. I settled for an inferior location at the Convention Centre.
The original location, it turned out, was subsequently rented by the Folk Arts Council,
whose President, it was later learned, was the same David Langtry, my lawyer.
In December 1987, when my business was open, the Convention Centre Corporation
had neglected and refused to remove a sign for the defunct Executive Travel, which had
rented offices at the Convention Centre. The Convention Centre Corporation told me
that this defunct travel office was now under the control of the Folk Arts Council. Despite
repeated requests to the Folk Arts Council, to David Morrison of the Folk Arts Council,
and to the Convention Centre Corporation by me and my corporation, verbally and in
writing, the sign was not removed or the light in the sign turned off. As a direct result,
many customers and potential customers who visited the Convention Centre looking for
me and my business would see the open curtain, the travel sign and the overturned
chairs in this bankrupt and deserted space next to the Folk Arts Council and would leave,
convinced my business was bankrupt.
I had sent copies of my entreaties to the Convention Centre Corporation and the Folk
Arts Council, and to the Langtry over a period of about 3 or 4 months. Langtry told me
that he was unable to assist me or my corporation. When the I threatened, in
desperation, to tear down the sign, the Convention Centre Corporation simply asked one
of its maintenance personnel to remove the plastic fascia, a job which took about ten
minutes. By that time, I learned that the word around town was that my business had
gone bankrupt and the office had been abandoned but I was still trying to collect money
for travel sales.
A short time later I obtained information that Langtry was President of Folk Arts
Council, the same organization to which I had been directing
written and personal appeals for the removal of the sign, or the closing
of the curtains abandoned office, or the turning off of the light to the sign
I confronted Langtry with this information, this Langtry said that he
was 'unaware' that the letters had been sent to the Folk Arts Council
or that entreaties had been made to them. Langtry did not deny
receiving copies of my letters to the landlord or his phone calls
asking for help, but told me that he assumed that this was a problem
for the landlord.
Instead of dealing with the issue of his apparent conflict, Langtry
again reminded me to be 'careful of the message' of the manuscript
of my book. At no time had Langtry revealed his relationship
to Folk Arts Council to me nor had he told me in November of 1987,
that the Folk Arts Council would rent the office space which I
desired and which contract terms he was assisting me to negotiate
and conclude
[I learned subsequently, that Langtry's relative, Chris Lorenc, was also
a member of the board of directors of the Convention Centre
Corporation, while I was struggling to obtain assistance from that
corporation in relation to the signs.]
At about the same time, I asked Langtry to represent my interests in relation to a
campaign by the owners of the Pegasus reservation system, with a senior Manitoba
manager of Air Canada and by ACTA, the Alliance of Canadian Travel Associations, to
prevent him from operating his business, which was a merger of the communications
and travel industries. Eventually, Langtry refused to represent me, stating that they
represented ACTA and Air Canada. However, they first obtained all of my files and
positions before relaying this information regarding their representing ACTA and Air
Canada.
Finally, when I could not persuade Langtry to return my numerous phone calls,
sometimes several per day, I resorted to subterfuge, left the name Israel Wiseman, a
private phone number and, within minutes of my being told once more that Langtry was
not in office, Langtry telephoned this special phone number and asked for the fictional
Israel Wiseman. When his call, taken by Wade Williams, a visible minority community
leader, he was transferred to me.
Langtry, embarrassed, apologised to me for ignoring my business files and calls, and
told me that he would meet out of his office and explain, 'unofficially', what was
happening.
At that meeting which took place at the Winnipeg Convention Centre cafeteria, Langtry
repeated his partners' concerns about my political opinions, my book, THE BLACK BUG
, and my friendship with Wade Tudor Williams, a Black community activist, whom Langtry
described as 'a racist.' Langtry also told me that it was not only my files which had been
neglected but that the Law Society had strongly recommended to him that he pay more
timely attention to his other clients. He agreed to devote some attention to some of my
pending matters, which he did, slowly.
Around 1990, Israel Asper's CKND tv station devoted three consecutive news casts to
my company's operation of a remote self training system, by which persons would be
linked to a mammoth American Airlines data base in the USA, in direct competition with
the Premier of Manitoba's Success College. Some of the material used to prepare the
newscast was material from my legal files with the perps. [I subsequently prevailed in a
case brought by the Manitoba justice system regarding Private Schools and which was
heavily influenced by the senior prosecutor mentioned below.]
When THE BLACK BUG - The Genetic Bomb Has Arrived - was published in November
1990, organizations to which the Wilder Wilder Langtry group belonged pressured
booksellers to remove the books from their shelves or to not order. These organizations
actively promoted me as being anti-Semitic, based on this book.
This even took the form of a conversation with plaintif's former lawyer, Alexander
Mackenzie, and a senior prosecutor of the Manitoba justice system, who approached
MacKenzie prior to my trial, to state that, because I was 'a known anti-semite', he could
arrange a non-Jewish judge.
This conversation had a frightening and poisonous effect on the Mackenzie's relationship
with me, as was intended. MacKenzie shortly after told me that he ‘had to earn a living in
this town’ and suggested another lawyer act for me.
The matters in some of the above are intended to show that the Langtry and his cohorts
actions were part of a deliberate plan to harm me personally, to harm my business
endeavours, and to deprive me of his civil and constitutional rights, and are part of a
pattern of behaviour including criminal and civil wrongs.
Their actions have resulted in tragic consequences for me and my family emotionally and
financially including my being prosecuted and convicted for perjury.
I ask that you investigate these matters and cooperate with me so that I can provide
more information if needed. If any of these matters also should be investigated by the
RCMP, kindly also advise me promptly.
Sincerely,
J. Ishmael
| Contents: Charter Rights Information - Law Society Of MB revolving doors for bent lawyers - Complaints about David Langtry formerly of Wilder Wilder Langtry - Ex-lawyer Remi C. Smith - Crooked lawyer information - Complaint re Gerry Mcneiley of Legal Aid MB |
| CLICK FOR HOME PAGE |
| Reader, Do you believe that the Winnipeg Police Chief will investigate his own force's complicity and also the criminality of the law firms and politicians involved? ish@ishmael.ca |
| 19-08-08 JOE AIELLO: I believe that Mr. Aiello did the best that he could for me within a MB justice system that was inherently venal, especially at that time. He could have tilted at windmills [as I did] but instead he got the best result within a crooked legal system with the friends of the Wilders and Langtry in positions of influence within the prosecution, that he could. NO: Joe has not asked me to make this change or sued or threatened. I did meet him briefly earlier this year and realized that he was hurt and that I was uncharitable in my stress and anger, Be well and blessings, Joe Aiello. |
| ishmael.ca - e-Mail: ish@ishmael.ca |